Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Why should we continue to learn?
F ormal under-graduate and post-graduate education prepares us with the basic “potential” to implement health care. Actual medical practice and responsibilities place demands on the individual to maintain a relevant level of knowledge, skills, attitudes and even behaviour, to improve standards of practice and patient care. The tensions that arise at a personal level are knowing what to learn, w...
متن کاملExemelification of Parliamentary Debates
Parliamentary debates are an interesting domain to apply state-of-the-art information retrieval technology. Parliamentary debates are highly structured transcripts of meetings of politicians in parliament. These debates are an important part of the cultural heritage of countries; they are often free of copy-right; citizens often have a legal right to inspect them; and several countries make gre...
متن کاملBringing parliamentary debates to the Semantic Web
An analysis of parliamentary debates and media resources that cover them can provide insight into the political climate of a country. Although debates are now regularly published on official government portals, their analysis remains a cumbersome and challenging task for historians and political scientists. One of the main tasks of the PoliMedia project is to allow easy crossmedia comparisons a...
متن کاملAdvanced Information Access to Parliamentary Debates
Parliamentary debates are highly structured transcripts of meetings of politicians in parliament. These debates are an important part of the cultural heritage of many countries; they are often free of copy-right; citizens often have a legal right to inspect them; and several countries make great effort to digitize their entire historical collection and make it available to the general public. T...
متن کاملModelling argumentation in parliamentary debates
In this paper we apply the information state update (ISU) machinery to tracking and understanding the argumentative behaviour of participants in a parliamentary debate in order to predict its outcome. We propose to use the ISU approach to model the arguments of the debaters and the support/attack links between them as part of the formal representations of a participant’s information state. We f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2308-0914,2308-0906
DOI: 10.7227/r.21.2.4